Research Paper Rubric Student Name:
___________________________
|
D
Beginning
|
C-/C
Emerging
|
B-/C+
Developing
|
B+/B
Proficient
|
A-/A
Commendable
|
A+
Exemplary
|
Points Available
|
2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 7 7.5 8
|
|||||
Ideas
Points:
|
c No message
c No clear ideas or
evidence of topic
c Details are undeveloped
c Questions are
unanswered
|
c Vague, unclear
c Ideas are limited,
reader assembles
c Details are limited,
vague
c Many questions are left
unanswered
|
c Not
always clear
c General
ideas, need guesswork
c Details
are vague, repeat
c Some
questions left unanswered
|
c Somewhat
clear
c Ideas
can be inferred, drawn out
c Includes
some detail
c Key,
basic issues covered for reader
|
c Clear,
concise
c Ideas
are strong and are identifiable
c Details
support claim
c Answers
many questions for reader
|
c Focused,
clear
c In-depth
ideas that give direction
c Carefully
selected details
c Answers
all questions for reader
|
Organization
Points:
|
c Hard
to follow, needs re-reading
c Many
elements need reordering
c No
transitions, piece is choppy
c No
opening or closing exist in piece
|
c Reader
frequently feels lost
c Out
of place elements, distracting
c Hard
to connect elements of piece
c Opening,
closing formulaic/unclear
|
c Reader
feels lost at times
c Out-of-place,
not distracting elements
c Transitions
are missing, overdone
c Opening,
closing lack direction
|
c Readily
followed with attention
c Workable
structure, order
c Discussion
holds together
c Beginnings
of opening, closing
|
c Piece
is easy to follow for reader
c Sequencing
promotes clarity
c Transitions
create coherence
c Opening
and closing exist in piece
|
c Guides
reader through thinking
c Thoughtful,
effective sequencing
c Piece
is cohesive, transitions are subtle
c Compelling
opening and closing
|
Voice
Points:
|
c No
sense of writer’s “presence”
c No
confidence
c No
reader connection
c Unaware
of audience, purpose
|
c Encyclopedic
or the wrong voice
c Hesitant
voice
c Little
connection with reader
c Does
not fit with audience, purpose
|
c Voice
comes and goes during piece
c Inconsistent
c Indifferent
connection to reader
c Needs
fit with audience, purpose
|
c Functional voice, sharable
moments
c Some confidence
c Moments of connection
to reader
c Clearly aware of
audience, purpose
|
c A
possible “read-aloud” piece
c Self-assured
c Keeps
readers engaged, interested
c Appropriate
for audience, purpose
|
c Engaging
– a “read-aloud” piece
c Authoritative
c Strong
voice, hard to put down
c Matches
purpose and audience well
|
Word
Choice
Points:
|
c Confusing,
incorrect language
c Flat
or inflated, jargon, clichés, slang
c No
strong verbs
c Modifiers
are misused, distracting
|
c Words
misused, vague, or unclear
c Some
inflated, flat language, jargon
c Strong
verbs rare
c Modifiers
are distracting
|
c Not always clear or
inflated/flat
c Moments of flat,
inflated, language
c Simplistic verbs
c Restraint of modifiers
needed
|
c Clear,
generally correct word choice
c Lively
phrasing outweighs clichés
c Balanced
verbs
c Modifiers
may be overdone
|
c Clear
and correct word choice
c Distinct,
lively phrasing dominant
c Utilizes
verbs
c Appropriate
use of modifiers
|
c Clear,
original, precise word choice
c
Consistent use of distinct phrasing
c Visual,
energetic
c Modifiers
used enrich meaning
|
Sentence
Fluency
Points:
|
c Hard
to follow, requires rereading
c Little
attention to sentence structure
c Structure
impairs meaning, content
c Revision
needed for reading aloud
|
c Slows
reader, require rereading
c Sentence
variety is inconsistent
c Problems
distract reader from content
c Reading
aloud a challenge
|
c Sentence errors slow
down reader
c Sentences are patterned,
formulaic
c Problems affect
readability
c Reading aloud takes
rehearsal
|
c Fairly
easy to read, despite errors
c Some
variety of sentence structure
c Strengths
outweigh problems
c Permits
reading aloud with practice
|
c Smooth, natural, errors are minimal
c Varied sentence
structure for clarity
c Few problems, high
readability
c Sentences allow reading
aloud
|
c Smooth, natural, easy
on the ear
c Highly varied sentence
structure
c No problems, high
readability
c Invites animated reading
aloud
|
Conventions
Points:
|
c Serious,
frequent errors; hard to read
c Reader
must mentally edit text
c Writer
struggles, even with basics
c Word-by-word
editing needed
|
c Several
errors, reading a challenge
c Errors
often impair readability
c Conventions
not under control
c Line-by-line
editing needed
|
c Noticeable,
distracting errors
c Errors
begin to affect readability
c Inconsistent
use of conventions
c Careful
editing needed to publish
|
c Errors
exist, little impact on clarity
c Conventions
support readability
c Writer
in control, but may make errors
c Ready
to publish with careful editing
|
c Errors minor, but no
impact on clarity
c Conventions support
meaning
c Writer in control of
most conventions
c Ready to publish with
minor editing
|
c Errors
minimal, inconsequential
c Conventions
enhance content
c Writer
in control of all conventions
c Virtually
ready for publication
|
IIM Research Planner attached (25 pts) ____ Rough
draft attached (5 pts) _____
Positive
Feedback
|
Next
Steps
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment